EVIDENCE HIERARCHY
Every claim is tagged with a confidence level:
- C1 Verified by RCTs, systematic reviews, or established consensus
- C2 Credible published study or clinical guideline
- C3 Inferred from mechanism or calculated from data
- C4 Anecdotal, small uncontrolled studies, or forum consensus
- C5 Insufficient data
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
This project has no sponsorships, affiliate links, or industry funding. Where industry-funded studies are cited, their funding source is noted — and in several cases (collagen supplements, device studies), non-industry-funded research shows different results. We flag these discrepancies throughout.
LIMITATIONS
Individual variation is real — genetics account for ~60% of aging variation. Most clinical studies were conducted on Fitzpatrick I–III skin; recommendations for darker skin tones rely on smaller evidence bases. Combination effects are largely unstudied — most RCTs test single interventions. Dose, formulation, and pH all matter enormously.
This is not medical advice. Consult a dermatologist for personalized treatment.
SOURCES
This synthesis draws from 432 research files across 14 topic areas, including RCTs, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines. Each claim includes a confidence rating, effect size, sources, side effects, cost, and caveats. Source pages were downloaded for verification. An independent fact-check and bias verification pass was conducted across all topics.