Claim File c003 — Dioxybenzone (Benzophenone-8, BP-8)
CAS 131-53-3
Section 1: Identity
- INCI name: Benzophenone-8 [C1]
- USAN / FDA name: Dioxybenzone [C1]
- IUPAC: (2,2′-Dihydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)(phenyl)methanone (also written 2,2′-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone, "DHMB") [C1]
- Synonyms: BP-8, DHMB, Spectra-Sorb UV24, Cyasorb UV24, Eusolex 4360 (in some sources), 2,2′-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone [C1]
- CAS: 131-53-3 [C1]
- EC No.: 205-026-8 [C1]
- Molecular formula: C14H12O4 [C1]
- Molecular weight: 244.24 g/mol [C1]
- Physical: pale-yellow crystalline powder; mp 68 °C [C1]
- Solubility: lipophilic; very poorly water-soluble; soluble in ethanol, oils, common cosmetic solvents [C1]
Regulatory status (current as of May 2026)
| Jurisdiction | Status / max concentration |
|---|---|
| USA OTC Monograph M020 | up to 3% (the only Category-I limit set in the 1999 final monograph). Status under FDA 2021 Proposed Order: insufficient data for GRASE (additional safety data requested) — "stayed indefinitely" pending. [C1] |
| EU Annex VI | Not listed as a permitted UV filter (BP-8 is not approved as a UV filter in EU cosmetics; it can only appear as a non-UV-filter ingredient if compliant with Annex II/III and the safety assessment). [C1] |
| Australia (TGA) | Permitted up to 3% in sunscreens. [C2] |
| Japan | Permitted in some quasi-drug formulations; rare in modern products. [C3] |
| South Korea | Limited approval; up to 3% in sunscreens historically. [C3] |
| Hawaii / Florida reef bans | Not specifically named in SB2571 (which targets BP-3 and octinoxate); BP-8 included in some broader USVI/Palau "list" approaches. [C2] |
- Typical use levels: rare in modern formulations (sometimes called "the forgotten benzophenone"); occasionally used as a UVA-II booster at 1–3%, often paired with BP-3 or avobenzone. [C2]
Section 2: UV Absorption Spectrum
- λmax #1 (UVB): ~282–285 nm [C2]
- λmax #2 (UVA-II): ~325–352 nm — generally reported with a stronger long-wavelength band than BP-3, extending modestly further into UVA-II owing to the second (2′-hydroxyl) ortho-OH that enables a more extended H-bonded/conjugated chromophore [C2]
- Spectral coverage: ~260–360 nm. Functionally a UVB + UVA-II filter; weak at UVA-I. [C1]
- Molar absorption coefficient (ethanol):
- At λmax UVB (~284 nm): ε ≈ 1.5 × 10⁴ M⁻¹·cm⁻¹ (similar to BP-3) [C3]
- At long-wavelength λmax (~325–352 nm): ε ≈ 1.5–2.0 × 10⁴ M⁻¹·cm⁻¹ — comparable or slightly higher than BP-3 at this wavelength [C3]
- At 254 nm in aqueous matrix: 2.26–5.92 × 10³ M⁻¹·cm⁻¹ depending on pH [C2 — Wang 2023]
- E(1%, 1 cm) at long-wavelength max: ≈ 600–820 (computed) [C3]
- Solvent / pH dependence: Two ortho-hydroxyl groups give two intramolecular H-bonds and two ESIPT-active sites — the molecule has higher photostability potential than BP-3 in principle, although in practice empirical photostability is similar to BP-3. Bands red-shift in alkaline solution as 2-OH and 2′-OH ionize sequentially.
- Functional classification: moderate UVB + moderate UVA-II filter. Provides a slightly longer-wavelength tail than BP-3 alone.
Section 3: Photodegradation
- Photostability: considered photostable; similar profile to BP-3. Empirical data limited compared with BP-3 (commercial use is small). Reported retention >80% after typical sunscreen MED-irradiation protocols. [C3]
- Aqueous photodegradation: under simulated sunlight, pseudo-first-order rate constants in the 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹ range; UV/H₂O₂ and UV/persulfate AOP studies find half-lives of minutes under 254 nm irradiation. [C2 — Wang 2023, Chem Eng J]
- Quantum yield: not separately tabulated in the literature in a way comparable to BP-3; expected Φ_loss ≈ 10⁻⁴–10⁻³ by analogy. [C3 — inferred]
- Photoproducts: demethylation, hydroxylation, and dimerization products reported in AOP studies; specific products less characterized than BP-3.
- Behavior in formulation: stable in lipid-phase; sometimes used as a co-filter in older 1990s–2000s sunscreens.
- ROS generation: limited direct data; expected to be similar to BP-3, possibly slightly lower owing to additional ortho-OH facilitating ESIPT.
Section 4: Notable issues
4.1 Endocrine activity
- In vitro: BP-8 shows weak estrogenic activity in MCF-7 / yeast-ER assays — broadly similar order of magnitude to BP-3, possibly slightly weaker. Has been reported to inhibit human and rat placental 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD) at micromolar concentrations (Yan et al. 2023 Toxicol Appl Pharmacol). [C2]
- BP-8 is also a known in-vivo metabolite of BP-3 (along with BP-1 and 2,3,4-trihydroxybenzophenone), so endocrine concerns about BP-3 carry over into BP-8 exposure indirectly. [C1]
4.2 Skin penetration
- Limited published data for dioxybenzone specifically. Owing to similar lipophilicity to BP-3, comparable skin permeation expected. Not evaluated in the FDA Matta absorption studies. The FDA 2019/2021 proposed order specifically lists dioxybenzone among ingredients needing additional safety data including a maximum-use absorption study analogous to those done for BP-3. [C1]
4.3 Aquatic / coral toxicity
- Sparse direct data. As a structural analog of BP-3 (and as a metabolite of BP-3 in coral and human metabolism), it is plausibly active; however, no high-profile coral planula study analogous to Downs 2016 has been published for BP-8. Rare in coastal contamination surveys (low cosmetic use → low environmental loads). [C3]
4.4 Allergenicity
- Reported as a contact and photocontact allergen. Less common than BP-3 in patch-test series, partly reflecting lower commercial usage. Cross-reactivity with BP-3 is documented. [C2]
4.5 Phototoxicity / photo-genotoxicity
- A 2015 dermal cassette-dose study (Sakuratani et al. J Toxicol Sci 40:439) examined phototoxicity of multiple benzophenones; BP-8 was within the same risk range as other benzophenones — modest potential photo-irritation, no strong photo-genotoxic signal in standard 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test at relevant concentrations.
Confidence
- Identity / regulatory → C1 (FDA 3% specifically)
- Spectrum λmax → C2
- Photodegradation kinetics → C3 (sparse)
- Endocrine activity → C2
- Skin penetration / human absorption → C3 (no MaxUse study)
- Coral toxicity → C3 (no direct planula study)
Key citations
- FDA OTC Monograph M020 — Sunscreen Drug Products (dioxybenzone listed at up to 3%).
- FDA Proposed Order OTC000008 (24 Sept 2021).
- CIR Amended Safety Assessment of Benzophenones (2021): https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/benzop032021FAR.pdf
- Wang Y et al. Chem Eng J 2023, "Degradation of benzophenone-8 in UV/oxidation processes". doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.144xxx (search result)
- Sakuratani Y et al. J Toxicol Sci 2015;40:439-451. doi:10.2131/jts.40.439 — phototoxic risk assessments on benzophenones.
- DrugBank monograph DB11221 (Dioxybenzone).