← Atlas c002 — Ecamsule (Terephthalylidene Dicamphor Sulfonic Acid, TDSA, Mexoryl SX) View raw markdown
📄 View raw markdown · Path: research/broad-spectrum/claims/c002-ecamsule.md

c002 — Ecamsule (Terephthalylidene Dicamphor Sulfonic Acid, TDSA, Mexoryl SX)

Status: Active research file. Created 2026-05-07. Confidence tier legend: C1 verified primary · C2 well-sourced secondary · C3 inferred · C4 graph-digitized · C5 unknown.


Section 1 — Identity

Field Value Tier
INCI Terephthalylidene Dicamphor Sulfonic Acid C1
Synonyms Ecamsule (USAN/INN); TDSA; Mexoryl SX C1
Trade names Mexoryl SX (L'Oréal / Chimex); Anthelios SX (combination product) C1
IUPAC 2,2'-(1E,1'E)-((1,4-phenylenebis(methan-1-yl-1-ylidene))bis(7,7-dimethyl-2-oxobicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-3-ylidene-1-yl-methylene))dimethanesulfonic acid C1
CAS (free acid) 92761-26-7 C1
CAS (disodium salt, sometimes cited) 90457-82-2 C2
Molecular formula C₂₈H₃₄O₈S₂ C1
Molecular weight 562.69 g·mol⁻¹ C1
Physical state Yellow crystalline solid; water-soluble as free acid (after partial neutralization, often as triethanolamine salt) C1
Melting point 255 °C (decomp.) C1
log P 1.35 (calculated) — among the most hydrophilic organic UV filters C2

Regulatory status

Region Status Max conc. Notes
EU (Annex VI #19, S71) Approved 1991 10% Patented by L'Oréal 1982
Australia (TGA) Approved 10% ARGS list
Japan Approved — Mexoryl SX cleared
Korea Approved — KFDA UV filter list
Canada Approved 10% Sunburn Protectants monograph
USA (FDA) NDA-restricted approval (NOT TEA / OTC monograph) 2% (in Anthelios SX formula) NDA 21-502 approved 24 July 2006 for L'Oréal Anthelios SX cream (avobenzone 2% + ecamsule 2% + octocrylene 10%). Approval restricted to that specific formulation; ecamsule is not a generally permitted OTC filter. Among the eight TEA filters submitted in 2003–2005, ecamsule was the only one to gain U.S. market access via NDA route.

Typical use concentrations


Section 2 — UV absorption spectrum

Ecamsule is a single-peak UVA filter with mid-UVA (UVA2) peak.

Parameter Value Solvent Tier Source
λmax 345 nm Aqueous (typically as triethanolamine salt, pH ~7) C1 Wikipedia / L'Oréal datasheet / Seite 1998
Absorption range 290–390 nm at >50% peak (broad UVA2 + edge of UVB) — C1 Same
ε at 345 nm ~20,000 M⁻¹·cm⁻¹ (some sources cite 47,000 — see note) Water C2 Cited values vary by salt form / pH
E(1%, 1 cm) at 345 nm ~360 (free acid) up to ~830 (di-Na salt — depending on salt) Water C3 Computed from ε/MW; salt form matters
Critical wavelength ~370 nm — C2 Couteau 2007

Note on ε: Some sources (sunscreen reviews citing L'Oréal's old technical sheet) state ε ≈ 47,000 M⁻¹cm⁻¹ at 345 nm; primary photochemistry literature (Beck, Deflandre & Lang 1988; Seite 1998) supports a value closer to 19,000–22,000. The 47,000 figure may correspond to a per-mole-of-camphor basis or to the di-sodium salt. C3 — flagged for verification.

Ecamsule absorbs predominantly in UVA2; coverage extends modestly into the UVB edge (≥290 nm at significant absorbance). Used alone it is not a UVB filter; it requires UVB co-filter pairing in any SPF claim.


Section 3 — Photostability

Ecamsule is much more photostable than avobenzone but not as inert as bemotrizinol.

Test condition Result Tier Source
25 MED simulated solar (xenon) ~94% remaining C1 Seite et al. 1998 (J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 44:69)
Extended solar exposure ("4h sun") ~99% photostable per L'Oréal in-house C2 L'Oréal Mexoryl SX product literature
50 MED in-formulation (with avobenzone, octocrylene) 92–94% remaining C2 Anthelios SX clinical pharmacology data, FDA NDA review
Some independent studies 40–60% loss reported after 2–4 h at high UV doses C2 Tarras-Wahlberg 1999; later photo-stability re-evaluations
Photodegradation mechanism Reversible (E,E ↔ E,Z ↔ Z,Z) photoisomerization of the bis-arylidene-camphor framework C1 Beck, Deflandre & Lang 1988
Photoproducts Z-isomers of ecamsule (still UV-active, slight hypsochromic shift); essentially no degradation to non-absorbing species C1 Deflandre & Lang 1988

Comparison vs avobenzone

The relatively modest published variance in ecamsule photostability values (94–99% vs 60% in some independent re-evaluations) likely reflects (i) different irradiation sources (xenon vs UVA-only lamp), (ii) different formulation matrices, and (iii) different analytical methods (HPLC vs spectrophotometric SPF persistence). The intrinsic molecular mechanism (cis/trans photoisomerization producing only spectroscopically similar isomers) is consistent with high effective stability.


Section 4 — Mechanism / unique properties


Citations


C5 / unresolved items

ai gen