ai gen
← The Biohacking Atlas
Biohacking Atlas • README.md

Biohacking — Landscape Overview

A map of the 2026 biohacking landscape as a family of overlapping scenes, oriented toward three end-goals: (1) substrate independence / mind-uploading ("Friendship is Optimal"); (2) the author's "biopunk 2037" bioengineered-organs worldbuilding; (3) a real Nozick Experience Machine. The three turn out to be one project at different radii.

Built via iterated research loops: parallel scene research → synthesis → independent critique → gap-fix → three goal-deepenings → an independent cross-model pass (every goal re-researched from scratch by OpenAI gpt-5.5 via codex, then reconciled). See CLAUDE.md for the plan.

The interactive site (webapp/index.html) is framed around the reframe below: the ecosystem as a map of gaps, with an AGI-this-decade vs slow-world toggle that re-weights the whole landscape.

Start here (the reframe)

Goal deepenings

The seven scene docs

# Scene Maturity headline
01 Grinder / DIY body-mod Small, aging, fracturing; only commercial chip layer scaled
02 Bay bio startups (organ sacs + reprogramming + regenerative) Xeno/bioengineered organs real & in humans; "age reversal" unproven
03 BCI / Neuralink Real for restoring function; not an uploading path (~7 OOM gap)
04 WBE / uploading / brain preservation Fly + mouse-mm³ connectomes done; human ~1M× away; bottleneck = data + unsolved science
05 Trans / transhumanism (morphological freedom) DIY HRT = the most mature present-day body-hacking practice
06 Mainstream longevity / quantified self Best evidence (exercise/sleep) is free; revenue is in the weakest-evidence layer
07 Community / culture / ideology One ideological family, fragmented; re-merges at Lighthaven / Próspera

_critique.md holds the independent red-team pass + resolution log.

Honest framing

This is AI-compiled from web sources, AI fact-checked (an independent critique pass + an independent second-model research pass), not personally verified by the author. The corpus is deliberately non-sycophantic — it flags hype and grift, and its residual bias (per the critique) runs skeptical, not optimistic. The clearest sign: two different models (Claude + gpt-5.5), researching independently, both lowered the author's own worldbuilding optimism on whole-body cultivation. Demonstrated vs. speculative is marked throughout; load-bearing numbers carry source URLs and confidence tiers.

../chip-implants/ · ../organ-sacs/ · ../longevity/ · ../peptides/ · /workspace/cryonics/ · /workspace/trans/ · /workspace/fiction/rationalist-fiction/

Status